Brown,
Stephen Gilbert and Sidney I. Dobrin, eds.
Ethnography Unbound: From
Critical Theory Shock to Critical Praxis.
Albany: State University of
New York Press, 2004. 326pp. ISBN 0791460525, $24.95.
ABHIJIT
VARDE
Ohio
State University
varde.1@osu.edu
Following a long and illustrious
tradition of publishing on composition studies, SUNY Press, with the publication
of Ethnography Unbound has made an equally impressive addition to its
collection. Emerging out of the
collective work of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC),
Ethnography Unbound seems set on the singular goal of redefining the
assumptions, methods, and goals of qualitative and ethnographic research in
composition studies. In setting
forth this goal, the introduction lists a number of complex questions. Thought provoking with admirable motivations, these questions
strike a somewhat canonically strident activist note. However, they help situate the anthology within the long and
often difficult relationship that ethnography and composition studies have had
with postmodernity.
Critical
ethnography, as
the editors of Ethnography Unbound propose, is the method and vehicle
toward their mission. They further
assert that critical ethnography constructively challenges the attack that
postmodern theory has leveled against traditional ethnography.
In the process, the editors of Ethnography Unbound contend that
critical ethnography offers a model that is in tune with ethical issues of
postmodern theory and capable of describing lives of strangers in a more
respectful, egalitarian, and empowering manner than what traditional ethnography
was capable of. It is able to do
this while simultaneously finding a meaningful location and context for the
ethnographer’s biography. In the
editors’ words …
In
its emergent, postpositivist incarnation, critical ethnography is personalizing,
politicizing, and socializing its praxis: it is politicizing the ends of
ethnographic inquiry and socializing the process of ethnographic
knowledge-making, while rediscovering its own critical voice with which it with
which it is beginning to "talk back" to postmodern theory to answer
the: fundamental questions the postmodern assault on traditional ethnographic /
practice raised (p.2).
Aside
from the introduction to the reader, the rest of the 15 chapters of Ethnography
Unbound have been organized under five separate sections:
1) Theoretical and Rhetorical Perspectives, 2) Place-Conscious
Ethnographies: Situating Praxis in the Field, 3) The Nomadic Self: Reorganizing
the Self in the Field, 4) Ethnographies of Cultural Change, and 5) Texts and (Con)texts:
Intertextual Voices. Each of the
categories contains several individual ethnographies by each of the volume’s
contributors, except the fifth and final category which contains two essays that
function as substantial and expansive theoretical summaries of the rest of the
contributors’ writing. What follows below is a brief comment on each of the
four main sections.
Of
the four essays in the first section, Bruce Horner’s merits a special mention.
Horner reinforces a dialectic between theory and practice, in general, and
between cultural materialist perspectives and critical praxis, in particular.
His exposé of the limitation of postmodernity in reductively
representing the ethnographic self under the rubric of “Lone Ethnographer”
is insightful and instructive towards a better understanding of the functional
aspects of critical ethnography in composition studies.
The fifth essay by Lynée Lewis Gallet discusses the Writing Program
Redesign which explores a symbiotic relationship between the ethnographic and
the rhetorical. Gallet proposes
writing programs grounded in the concept of “civitas,” informed by a civic
rhetoric and writing inspired by a civic tongue.
After the theoretical ruminations in Horner’s essay, Gallet’s essay
serves as a good working example of critical praxis.
In
the second section, “Place-Conscious Ethnographies: Situating Praxis in the
Field,” Brooke and Hogg envision the field site as emerging through the
“filter” of doing ethnography where ethnographic knowledge is seen as having
a constructed nature. They
problematize Ralph Cintron’s positioning of Aristotelian ethos with a Burkean
perspective. The result of this
theoretical stance is the analysis of two site-specific projects that usefully
complete the dialectic between theory and praxis and attest to the possibility
of community-based project driven ethnographies.
Following Brooke and Hogg, Stevens’ essay also sees the field site as
emerging through the ethnographer’s interpretive stance.
She draws on Donna Haraways’ notion of “diffraction” to establish a
relationship between the ethnographer and the field site that resonates with
Brooke and Hogg’s concept of “filter.”
The
editor’s have generously identified Susan Hanson’s essay, “Critical
Auto/Ethnography,” as creating a whole new genre (p. 8) in the volume’s
third section entitled “The Nomadic Self: Reorganizing the Self in the
Field.” Editorial generosity notwithstanding, Hanson’s technique of
fusing feminist autobiography with postcolonial theory is certainly an original
ethnographic treatment of text.
In
the fourth section entitled “Ethnographies of Cultural Change,” Williams and
Brydon-Miller provides yet another example of critical practice in action
through ethnography. Influenced by
Paolo Freire, they emphasize “social justice” and “social reflexivity”
to link ethnographic analysis to cultural action in their essay “Changing
Directions: Participatory Action Research.”
What
is of particular interest to this writer about Ethnography Unbound is the
methodologically political and deeply personalized relationship with
ethnographic acquisition, production and analyses of texts that has
systematically, if not organically, been allowed to grow as a collective effort
of all of its contributors. For
those serious students and teachers of composition studies who are keen on
integrating political action and social change in their work using ethnographic
research, Ethnography Unbound is a welcome development.
While it is replete with humanistic jargon, it works hard at demystifying
critical ethnography as an answer to postmodern attack on postpositivist
ethnography. Ethnography Unbound,
thus, will provide those in composition studies looking for an expansion of
their theory and methodology tool box, plenty of useful choices. This is an
important book with quality scholarship.
©
2005 American Anthropological Association.
This review is cited in the March 2005 issue (36:1) of Anthropology
& Education Quarterly. It
is indexed in the December 2005 issue (36:4).